How DRI caught Amitabh and Abhishek Bachchans for alleged smuggling

Reliance's Tax Advisor & ex-IRS Officer Sandeep Tandon dies of cancer Bad News for NDT-Delhi High Court decides to hear paternity suit against Tiwari filed by Rohit Shekhar, who claims that he is biological son of ND Tiwari Haryana Assembly okays Special Economic Zone (Amendment) Bill, 2010, which seeks to provide for refund of stamp duty on registration of land collected from developers of SEZs in the state before notification of SEZ Microsoft loses 106 million dollar Patent verdict Sensex hits 17500 Points in early trading FM says inflation may hit double digit in March Authority for Advance Ruling rules the payments made to ABB Research Ltd., Zurich towards the applicant's share of the cost incurred in respect of R&D activities are not liable to be taxed under the Income Tax Act, 1961 as business income in the absence of permanent establishment in India, having regard to Art.7 of the Tax Treaty- Nor can it be subjected to tax as royalty or fees for technical services under Article 12 of the Treaty-AIT-2010-94-AAR Tariff Value for import of Brass Scrap is 3801 and for poppy seeds 4256-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 20 No approval for procurement of service “Rental” of immovable property for office outside the Special Economic Zone/FTWZ can be given-SEZ Instruction No. 49 on Clarifications on FTWZ issues Consolidated list of default authorized operations which can be undertaken by the developer/approved co-developer by default from the date of notification-SEZ Instruction No.50 Himachal Government hikes VAT from 4 per cent to 5 per cent on all items, except edible oils and foodgrains Authority for Advance Ruling rules no capital gains accrued or arose at the time of conversion of partnership firm into a private limited company under Part IX of the Companies Act and therefore, notwithstanding the non-compliance with clause (d) of proviso to Section 47(xiii) of the Income Tax Act, by reason of premature transfer of shares, the said company is not liable to pay capital gains tax-AIT-2010-93-AAR Authority for Advance Ruling rules if the purchasers are non-residents other than the applicant, the applicant is liable to pay tax in India on the amount received by it for the support services rendered through the branch office in India-AIT-2010-92 -AAR Jurisdiction of Dispute Resolution Panel-Income Tax Order No.3 Employment of washing process in the manufacture of agglomerates etc from imported plastic waste and scrap-SEZ Instruction No.48 Haryana Government imposes surcharge ranging from 0.25 per cent to 0.7 per cent on VAT Service Tax Notification No. 17/2010 which exempts the taxable service providing packaged or canned software, intended for single use and packed accordingly amended-Service Tax Notification No.18 Procurement, Import and Export of Prohibited and Restricted Goods by SEZ Units-SEZ Instruction No. 47 Authority for Advance Ruling rules the amounts received/receivable by Technopromexport from NTPC under contract for Offshore supply of all plant and equipment including mandatory spares are not liable to tax in India under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and DTAA between India and Russia-AIT-2010-79-AAR

JUDGMENTS

CENTRAL EXCISE

CUSTOMS

exchange rate

SERVICE TAX

INCOME TAX

VAT

FINANCE ACTS

FINANCE BILLS

EOU STPI

SEZ

DGFT

RBI

NTT

RESOURCES

Email | Print

How DRI caught Amitabh and Abhishek Bachchans for alleged smuggling

AIT News Network

Amitabh and Abhishek Bachchan MUMBAI. What Customs of Mumbai Airport could not do while Amitabh Bachchan and Abhishek Bachchan walked through the green channel from Mumbai International Airport with dutiable goods worth over Rs 1 Crore without paying any Customs duty, DRI has done by booking the duo for allegedly smuggling the dutiable goods in India as DGRI (Directorate-General of Revenue Intelligence) was acting on hard evidence against Bachchans.

Bachchans are said to have claimed VAT from VAT Counter at London’s Heathrow Airport on expensive goods purchased from Fashion and Designer Shops in London exported by them in April 2007 in their baggage to India on the strength of a declaration cum VAT refund form filed by them at London Airport. But after landing at Mumbai Airport Bachchans forgot to declare the said goods and considered the value of the said goods within their free allowance of Rs 25000/- and, therefore, confidently and innocently walked through the green channel.

What landed the duo in trouble was the evidence about the VAT refund of huge amount claimed by the duo in London received by DRI in India. Faced with the investigation and hard evidence; Bachchans had no option but to pay Customs duty of around Rs.36 Lakh alongwith the interest at the rate of 13 per cent. It was because of their celebrity status that the Bachchans were not arrested by DRI. Had there been another passenger; he would have been arrested for smuggling of expensive goods. But Bachchans are still to be slapped the show cause notice for penalty under Customs Act which is also equal to the customs duty involved in such cases.

Bachchans also failed to take any lesson from the case of a Delhi based Prominent Industrialist (who also incidentally happens to be a relative of Bachchans) who was arrested by DRI in 2004 on landing from London after crossing green channel with designer wear. He also claimed VAT refund of huge amount at Heathrow Airport. He had to remain behind the bars for several days and was bailed out by Delhi High Court.

But Bachchans are too busy to take care of their affairs. It is for their Secretaries to take care of their affairs. It is high time Bachchans should take their Customs duty payments seriously.

If the allegation of smuggling of imported goods above Rs 25 Lakhs is confirmed in adjudication proceedings under Customs Act; the importer of goods can also be prosecuted for smuggling by the Customs Department in a Court of Law.

Related Story:

· Aishwarya Rai wins Tax Appeal

· Shahrukh Khan wins Income Tax Litigation on Legal Point

· Brand Ambassadors under service tax net