Credit of service tax paid on services used in Business can not be denied

Refined or white sugar, imported upto 31st December 2010 exempted from Customs duty-Customs Tariff Notification No.8 excise exemption notification for Jammu & Kashmir modified-Central Excise Tariff Notification No.1 Air India may lower retirement age to 55 to cut cost Board of Approval to decide fate of denotification of Essar's Hazira SEZ on 11th February Revenue's comments on 1st Discussion Paper on GST-click on the link below for details SC rules service of notice on the assessee under Section 143(2) within the prescribed period of time is a pre-requisite for framing the block assessment under Chapter XIV-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961-AIT-2010-43-SC HC rules assessee is entitled to benefit under Income Tax on delayed payment of PF if the payment is made before the return is filed-AIT-2010-42-HC Authority for Advance Ruling rules the amount received by the foreign company from the Government of Tamil Nadu under the contract is essentially in the nature of “fees for technical services” within the meaning of Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with Article 12.4 of DTAA and cannot be regarded as consideration for the sale of designs and drawings-AIT-2010-38-AAR Authority for Advance Ruling rules payment received by the applicant from VARs (“third party re-sellers”) on account of supplies of software products to the end-customers (from whom the licence fee is collected and appropriated by VAR) does not result in income in the nature of royalty to the applicant and moreover payments received by the applicant cannot be taxed as business profits in India in the absence of permanent establishment as envisaged by Article 7 of the India-Japan Tax Treaty-AIT-2010- 36-AAR lending or borrowing money between two associated enterprises comes within the ambit of international transaction and whether the same is at arms length price has to be considered-The question of rate of interest on the borrowing loan is an integral part of arms length price redetermination in this context-AIT-2010-37-ITAT Export and Import of Currency-RBI Circular No.30 HC rules a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution would be maintainable for questioning reopening of the assessment in a case such as this where the preconditions for the exercise of the power have not been fulfilled-recourse to the power under Section 147 cannot be sustained on a mere change of opinion, there being no failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly, all material facts necessary for assessment-AIT-2010-35-HC Definitive Anti dumping duty imposed on import of Carbon Black used in rubber applications falling under sub heading 2803 00 10, originating in, or exported from, Australia, China PR, Russia and Thailand-Customs Tariff Notification No.6 Tariff Value for import of Brass scrap is 3597 and for poppy seeds 4392-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 10 Adjustment of “Advance Tax in respect of Fringe Benefits” for Assessment Year 2010-11 against “Advance Tax”-Income Tax Circular No.2 CBDT clarifies it is the choice of the assessee whether to file an objection before the Dispute Resolution panel against the draft assessment order or not to exercise this option and file an appeal later before CIT (Appeals) against the assessment order passed by the AO

JUDGMENTS

CENTRAL EXCISE

CUSTOMS

exchange rate

SERVICE TAX

INCOME TAX

VAT

FINANCE ACTS

FINANCE BILLS

EOU STPI

SEZ

DGFT

RBI

NTT

RESOURCES

Email | Print

Credit of service tax paid on services used in Business can not be denied

RS Sharma Advocate

Though Service Tax and Central Excise Department continue to slap notices for denial of CENVAT credit of service tax paid on services used in business; the credit is undoubtedly admissible.

Rule 2 (l) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 as amended defines “input service” as under:

“input service” means any service,-

(i) used by a provider of taxable service for providing an output service; or

(ii) used by the manufacturer, whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products and clearance of final products, upto the place of removal,

and includes services used in relation to setting up, modernization, renovation or repairs of a factory, premises of provider of output service or an office relating to such factory or premises, advertisement or sales promotion, market research, storage upto the place of removal, procurement of inputs, activities relating to business, such as accounting, auditing, financing, recruitment and quality control, coaching and training, computer networking, credit rating, share registry, and security, inward transportation of inputs or capital goods and outward transportation upto the place of removal;”

Thus input service includes services used in activities relating to business. Though some examples have been given in the above said definition by specifying some of the activities “such as accounting, auditing, financing, recruitment and quality control, coaching and training, computer networking, credit rating, share registry, and security” ; the said specified activities do merely denote some activities related to business which is only illustrative and not exhaustive and the scope and definition of the terms “in relation to” and “as such” is very wide and connotes all the activities related to business.

The meaning assigned to “input service” is divided in two parts, first part giving the specific meaning and the second part gives the inclusive meaning of the same. In the second part an inclusive meaning is given to “input service”, which otherwise would not have been covered in the main first part.

From this, it is a logical conclusion that manufacturer/output service provider can take credit of the service tax paid on all activities related to business, which are specified in the expanded inclusive definition of “input service”.

The decision of Supreme Court in case of Commissioner of Central Excise & Ors Versus M/s. Solaris Chemtech Limited & Ors AIT-2007-270-SC in Appeal (civil) 6465-6475 of 2001 is also to the effect that the expression "in relation to" must be given a wide connotation.

Further, the definition cannot be given a restrictive meaning as held by the Supreme Court in the case of Regional Director vs. High land coffee Works as under:

"The word "include" in the statutory definition is generally used to enlarge the meaning of the preceding words and it is by way of extension, and not with restriction. The word `include' is very generally used in interpretation clauses in order to enlarge the meaning of words or phrases occurring in the body of the statute; and when it is so used, these words or phrases must be construed as comprehending, not only such things as they signify according to their natural import but also those things which the interpretation clause declares that they shall include.

The credit of the service tax paid on the outdoor catering/canteen service is admissible as input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. has been held to be admissible by CESTAT in case of Victor Gaskets Limited, Bosch Chassis Systems India Limited & M/s. Bajaj Electricals Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-I AIT-2008-406-CESTAT on the reasoning that it is covered within the ambit of activities related to business and thus entitled as “input service” under credit rules.

The appellants had provided a canteen facility in their factory for their employees. This was a statutory requirement under Section 46 of the Factory Act. The service provider issued the invoices to the appellants for the said Outdoor Catering Services and the appellants had availed the Cenvat Credit on the strength of such invoices. The appellants contended that they pay fringe benefit taxes on canteen related expenses under Income Tax Act and as the said tax is a levy on business related expenses, the Appellants’ payment of the same on the canteen related expenses would be considered as a business related expenses and hence, the same would get covered under the “activities relating to business” stipulated in the inclusive definition of input service u/r 2(l) of CCR, 2004.

Larger Bench of CESTAT in APPEAL NO. E/ 1279/07-Mum & E/CO-239/07-Mum CCE, Mumbai-V Versus M/s GTC Industries Ltd AIT-2008-407-CESTAT has also ruled that employment of outdoor caterer for providing catering services has to be considered as an input service relating to the business and cenvat credit in respect of the same will be admissible.

Therefore the credit of service tax paid on activities although not directly or indirectly related to manufacture of goods, is admissible as input service credit to a manufacturer of final products as well as to output service provider treating the same as activities in relation to business. The denial of such credit by the authorities is illegal and without any justification.

(The Writer is an Advocate & Consultant based in Delhi. He is advising several MNCs, PSUs and Indian Corporates on service tax, central excise, customs & Foreign Trade matters. He can be mailed at rssharma@gmail.com )

Related News: