Exchange Rate for imported goods is Rs 74.03 Per Pound Sterling and Rs 51.22 Per Yen-Exchange Rate for export is Rs 72.45 Per Pound Sterling and Rs 49.94 Per Yen-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.128      Sensex slips further and closes at 8773   100 per cent EOUs allowed to export non-basmati rice-DGFT Notification No.59      Customs duty of 5 per cent imposed on import of Pig Iron, spiegeleisen, semi-finished products, flat products & long products    Import of Crude Soyabean Oil subjected to 20 per cent customs duty- no change in import duty on refined soyabean oil-Customs Tariff Notification No.122    Time-limit for filing refund of service tax extended to 6 months-Service Tax Notification No.32   Rahul Bajaj asks Industry to prepare for the worst     Tariff Value for import of Brass Scrap is 3525 and for poppy seeds 5206-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 127     CBEC clarifies the entire amount of duty paid by the manufacturer, as shown in the invoice would be available as credit irrespective of the fact that subsequent to clearance of the goods, the price is reduced by way of discount or otherwise-Central Excise Circular No.877      Mandavariya (Kishangarh), District Ajmer notified for Unloading of imported goods and loading of export goods-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.117    SC Ruling-the entitlement of benefit in terms of Section 32AB, Section 80HH and Section 80I of the Income Tax Act- conversion of Jumbo rolls of photographic films into small flats and rolls in the desired sizes amounted to manufacture/production-AIT-2008-413-SC   SC Ruling-Whether any "gift" arose in terms of Section 2(xii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 on the allotment of rights issue by the appellant company to its shareholders vide Board's Resolution- Whether there was any element of "gift" as defined under Section 2(xii) in the appellant issuing Bonus shares in the ratio of 1:23-AIT-2008-412-SC    DEPB benefit allowed on export of cement and steel-DGFT PN 108   exports of cement in all types and forms and primary steel products eligible for export incentives under Focus Market Scheme-DGFT Notification No.58     Import of Marble Tiles-DGFT Notification No.57    Clarification on setting up Duty Free Shops approved by FIPB-Customs Circular No.19       HC Ruling-Income Tax-"reserves" arising out of the acquisition of the business of Tata Cellular Limited could never have the character of "income" in the hands of the petitioners-pre-requisite condition contained in proviso to section 147 to enable the re-assessment to be opened after period of 4 years have elapsed have not been met-AIT-2008-410-HC    HC Ruling-Central Excise- valuation of the goods for the purpose of excise duty and whether excise duty was chargeable under Section 4 or Section 4A of the Central Excise Act 1944-while construing rule 3, who are excluded are only the institutional or industrial consumers as explained in Rule 2A and the industrial or institutional consumers in terms of the proviso to rule 2(p) for the purpose of chapter-II are the same-If the person who purchase the prepacked commodity not directly from the manufacturer or packers, they are consumers and the declaration will be of no effect-AIT-2008-408-HC   Government considering imposition of import duty on steel      Bad News for Consulting Engineers- whether turnkey contract can be vivisected?- The conclusion in Daelim case on the point, prima facie, being not in accordance with law, matter goes to Larger Bench-AIT-2008-405-CESTAT  Larger Bench of CESTAT rules Credit is admissible on an input service relating to the business-AIT-2008-407-CESTAT   credit of the service tax paid on the outdoor catering (canteen) service is admissible as input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004-AIT-2008-406-CESTAT   The payment for use of "services for MTNL/other companies via the interconnect/port/access/toll by the assessee would not fall within the purview of payments as provided for under section 194J of the Act, so as to be eligible for tax deduction at source-The interconnect charges/port access charges cannot be regarded as fees for technical services-AIT-2008-404-HC   Computation of Value under Section 14 for Levy of Export Duty - Customs Circular No. 18          Advance Ruling- Whether the service fee paid by the applicant to Intertek Testing Management Limited UK under Global Management Service Agreement is taxable as "Royalties & Fee for Technical Services" as per the provisions of Article 13 of DTAA between India & UK? Whether the applicant is required to deduct tax at source on the service fee paid to Intertek Testing Management Limited, UK, at the rate of 10% plus applicable surcharge and cess as per the provisions of section 115A(1)(b)(BB) of the Income-tax Act-AIT-2008-401-AAR   Larger Bench of SC Ruling-whether the revenue can be precluded from filing an appeal even though in respect of some other years involving identical dispute no appeal is filed -AIT-2008-403-SC     SC Ruling-whether transfer of Banking Undertaking gave rise to taxable capital gains under Section 45 of the 1961 Act-it was not possible to compute capital gains and, therefore, the said amount of Rs. 10.20 cr. was not taxable under Section 45 of Income Tax Act-AIT-2008-400-SC   Export duty of 8 per cent notified in place of earlier rate of Rs. 200 per tonne on export of iron ore fines-Customs Tariff Notification No.121    Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination And Collection of Duty) Second Amendment Rules, 2008-Central Excise Non-Tariff Notification No.45   SC rules Ethylene and propylene manufactured by the assessee and used in its factory in the further manufacture of the same goods would be entitled to the benefit of exemption contained in notification no.217/86-AIT-2008-398-SC  New DEPB Rates on export of all products notified–DGFT PN 102  service tax paid under Section 66A is available as 'input credit' under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provided the said services are used as input services by the manufacturer or producer of final products or a provider of output taxable service-Service Tax Trade Notice No.43/2008  Anti-dumping duty imposed on import of cable ties from China & Taiwan-Customs Tariff Notification No.118   Definitive Anti-dumping duty imposed on import of Phenol from Singapore, South Africa & European Union-Customs Tariff Notification No.114  High-tech products entitled to benefits under High-Tech Products Export Promotion Scheme –DGFT PN 101   
Services  |  Subscribe  |  Contact Us  |   Feedback   |  E-mail  |  News |  Home
JUDGMENTS
CENTRAL EXCISE
CUSTOMS
SERVICE TAX
INCOME TAX
VAT
FINANCE ACTS
FINANCE BILLS
EOU STPI
SEZ
DGFT
RBI
NTT
RESOURCES


    
Email | Print

Job Work for Uttaranchal Himachal Units liable to Excise 

A K Bhasin   A K Bhasin Advocate

The Job Workers who are working for Units based in Excise Free Zones of Uttaranchal and Himachal are not entitled for exemption from Central Excise duty when the job workers themselves are located outside such zones as it is one of the main condition for availing the exemption under Central Excise Notification No.214/86 that the Final Product must be cleared on payment of duty. When no duty is being paid by Uttaranchal and Himachal Units; the question of excise exemption to a job worker who is located outside Uttaranchal or Himachal Zone does not arise.   

The concept of getting few processes done from outside the factory premises may be very old. If one looks back, the concept may be in practice by the Industry since beginning but what is to be seen is as to how the said concept was being dealt with, by the Central Excise Law. The Central Excise Act and Rules, were framed in 1944. In Central Excise Rules, the earliest known provision was contained in rule 56B of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944.

But the term job work was perhaps used for the first time in notification no. 119/75 – CE dated 30.04.75. The explanation in notification defined ‘job work’ as “such items of work where an article intended to undergo manufacturing process is supplied to job worker and the article is returned by the job worker to the supplier, after the articles have undergone the intended manufacturing process, on charging only for job work done by him.”

The concept of job work was recognized by Central Excise legislation when MODVAT Credit Rules were inserted in Central Excise Rules, 1944 vide notification no. 176/86 dated 01.03.86. Rule 57F(2) was specifically designed to deal with the situation that arise during the course of sending the goods to job work. Interestingly the word ‘job work’ is not used anywhere in the above rule. Central Government however issued a Notification No. 214/86 dated 25.03.86 to grant exemption to goods manufactured in a factory as job work. The term ‘job work’ is defined in explanation given in the notification.

This notification can be divided into four legs: First, is that the notification grants exemption to goods manufactured in a factory as a job work from whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon which is specified in Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and the additional duty of excise. What is important is that the goods should have been manufactured: -

(a)     in a factory; AND

(b)    as a job work.

Both the above ingredients shall be met, for claiming exemption under this notification.

The second leg pertains to various conditions that are required to be complied with. The exemption granted is not absolute but is subject to fulfillment of these conditions. These conditions are two fold. One part of conditions is before clearance from the premises of job worker. For example the following conditions are required to be seen for being eligible to avail the exemption: -

(a)        that the duty of excise is leviable in whole or in part on goods in which these are to be used subsequently. This means that if the final products are exempt or chargeable to Nil rate of duty, the benefit of exemption is not available. As an example following case law is referred: -

Machino craft Vs. CCE- Parts of solar collector manufactured on job work and returned to raw material supplier who used them in manufacture of Solar collector. Benefit of Notification No. 214/86 not available as solar collector is exempt under Notification No. 205/88.

(b)        that if the final products are exempt, the benefit of notification is still available provided such final products are: -

I.                   meant for removal to free trade Zone (FTZ) or to 100% EOU on Hardware Technology Park or Software Technology Park or supply to UNO or supply to international organization or supply to projects funded by these organizations.

II.                meant for removal under bond for export.

III.            meant for goods to be cleared after discharging obligation under rule 6 of the CENVAT credit Rules, 2004. That is, the goods would be cleared on payment of amount calculated at 10% of the sale price.

The second part of conditions is in the nature of post clearance. These conditions are to be fulfilled by supplier of goods. The notification is strange in a sense that this is perhaps the only notification, which grants exemption to one person whereas the conditions are required to be complied by another person. This means if supplier does not fulfill the conditions, the job worker would lose the benefit of exemption under this notification. One of the condition is that the supplier undertakes to discharge the duty liability and produces the evidence of the same. In nutshell the conditions to comply with, by supplier are as under: -

I.          Supplier of raw material / semi-finished goods gives an undertaking to the AC/DC having jurisdiction over the factory of job worker that the goods on receipt shall be

·         used in manufacture of final product

·         removal from his factory under bond from export

·         removed to a unit in STZ / EOU / Hardware/Software        Technology park / UNO / international Organization / Projects funded by these organizations.

·         removal by manufacturer of dutiable and exempted final products on payment of amount equal to 10% of sale price.

II.        The said supplier produces evidence that the said goods have been used or removed in the manner so prescribed.

III.      The said supplier undertakes to discharge duty liability on final products.

The third leg in notification is the definition of job work given in explanation at the end of notification. This definition assumes importance because of the reason that it is an inbuilt provision in the notification itself. Any diversion from the definition given in notification may lead to disentitlement of the exemption. It is also significant to note that there have been lot of amendments in the notification since its issuance and almost all other legs in the notification have undergone lot of changes whereas the explanation giving definition of job work had remained unchanged throughout.

The basic ingredients of the definition of job works are enumerated below: -

I.                   The raw material / semi-finished goods are supplied to the job worker.

II.                The said material itself is processed /worked upon.

III.            The activity done may be to complete a part or whole of the process.

IV.               The activity must result in the manufacture or finishing of an article.

V.                   Any other operation essential for said process.

The fourth leg pertains to the table annexed with the Notification. This table gives two lists each showing Description of goods. One list shows the goods, which are manufactured at job worker’s premises and to which the exemption is granted vide this notification. The second list gives those goods, which are the final products, which are manufactured at supplier’s end and in which the goods, manufactured at job worker’s end, are used. Initially the exemption was restricted to few articles but gradually the number of items in the list was enlarged and as on date almost all the items are covered except following:-

I.                   Polyster Filament Yarn falling under Ch. H. 5402.

II.                Light Diesel Oil

III.            High Speed Diesel Oil

IV.               Motor spirit known as petrol

Since a job worker is also a manufacture in true legal sense, the above discussion may be useful in dispelling various prevalent confusions regarding applicability of Central Excise duty on activity of job work.

 

  Copyright © 2006 allindiantaxes.com | All rights reserved
website designing India & CMS development: Softlogics & Developments