AIT NEWS-9

Justice Jasti Chelameswar, Chief Justice of Gauhati High Court transferred to Kerala High Court SV Gangapurwala appointed as Judge of Bombay High Court Akhilesh Chandra, Gopal Prasad andi Mungeshwar Sahoo appointed as Judges of Patna High Court BV Pinto, Bijoor Manohar, K.Govindarajulu and HS Kempanna appointed as Judges of the Karnataka High Court Half a dozen Officers of Goa Customs & CHA apply for anticipatory bail fearing arrest by CBI in duty evasion case of Adani Service Tax Notification No. 17/2010 which exempts the taxable service providing packaged or canned software, intended for single use and packed accordingly amended-Service Tax Notification No.18 Procurement, Import and Export of Prohibited and Restricted Goods by SEZ Units-SEZ Instruction No. 47 Tractors are chargeable to tractor cess in terms of the Tractor Cess Rules, 1992 read with the IDRA Act, 1951-Central Excise Circular No. 916 Authority for Advance Ruling rules the amounts received/receivable by Technopromexport from NTPC under contract for Offshore supply of all plant and equipment including mandatory spares are not liable to tax in India under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and DTAA between India and Russia-AIT-2010-79-AAR whether Cess levied under section 5 of Textile Committees Act, 1963 is includable as a component of CVD-AIT-2010-78-HC Export warehousing –Extension of facility at Gautam Budh Nagar in UP and Nagpur in Maharashtra-Central Excise Circular No. 917 Implementation of the provisions of COTP Act, 2003 and The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules, 2008- Empowering the Customs & Central Excise Officers-Central Excise Circular No. 918 Toilet linen and kitchen linen, of terry toweling or similar terry fabric, of cotton and of other textile materials added in Focus Product Scheme for exports made after 1st Jan 2010-DGFT PN 46 TDS on payment of interest on time deposits under Section 194A of the Income Tax Act by banks following Core-Branch Banking Solutions software-Income Tax Circular No.3 Tariff value for import of Brass scrap is 3732 and for poppy seeds 4640-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No.19 Duty Credit Scrips can also be used / debited towards payment of Customs Duties in case of EO defaults under Authorizations issued under Chapters 4 and 5 of the Policy-DGFT Notification No.32 SC Ruling-the nature of roll over premium charge incurred by the assessee as also the scope and applicability of Section 43A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the context of such charges-we find no merit in the contention of the assessee that roll over charges have nothing to do with the fluctuation in the rate of exchange-AIT-2010-75-SC Pre-authentication of excise invoices dispensed with Excise duty on Goggles and OTS cans hiked to 10 per cent av gas and mosquito net impregnated with insecticides subjected to 4 per cent excise Outright exemption from additional duty of customs (of 4%) leviable under sub-section (5) of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 to goods imported in a pre-packaged form and intended for retail sale Benefit of allowing Cenvat credit to be reversed on proportionate basis (when common inputs are used for the manufacture of dutiable and exempt products) extended retrospectively Bad News for flat bookers-unless the entire consideration for the property is paid after the completion of construction (i.e. after issuance of completion certificate by the competent authority), the activity of construction would be deemed to be a taxable service provided by the builder/promoter/developer to the prospective buyer and the service tax would be charged accordingly Bad News for ladies-sanitary napkins & kids diapers subjected to 10 per cent excise excise duty @ 4% imposed on specified IT products like microprocessor other than motherboards, floppy disc drives, CD-Rom drive etc when these items are meant for external use with a computer or laptop as a plug-in device Packaged software or canned software exempted from excise excise duty on Cartons, boxes and cases, of corrugated paper or paperboard manufactured by Standalone manufacturers lowered from 8% to 4% all ceramic tiles, whether manufactured by using electricity for firing the kiln or not, will attract a single excise duty rate of 10% process of drawing or redrawing of aluminium tubes and pipes as amounting to " manufacture" Excise duty on replaceable kits of all domestic water filters except those operating on RO technology reduced from 8% to 4% Excise duty exemption on parts, components and accessories of mobile handsets including cellular phones extended to parts of two accessories namely, battery chargers and hands-free headphones of these devices.

JUDGMENTS

CENTRAL EXCISE

CUSTOMS

exchange rate

SERVICE TAX

INCOME TAX

VAT

FINANCE ACTS

FINANCE BILLS

EOU STPI

SEZ

DGFT

RBI

NTT

RESOURCES

Email | Print

Loss incurred on sale of shares is speculation loss

AIT News Network

NEW DELHI. Vide a significant ruling AIT-2006-77-ITAT Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has ruled that loss incurred on sale of shares is speculation loss and Explanation to section 73 of Income Tax Act would be applicable when the assessee is an investment company.

The Facts: The assessee’s business was finance and leasing. It was incorporated with the object of buying and selling of shares and other financial activities. Return of income was filed on 28.11.1996 on a total loss of Rs. 6,65,220/-. The said loss was classified to be carried forward in accordance with provisions of section 72 of the Income-Tax Act. During the year, the assessee company dealt with shares of one company only .

The break up of income as per audited accounts for the year ending 31.3.1996 was as under:

Income

Dividend income

Rs. 13,73,200

Earning from purchase and sale of shares

12,68,257

26,41,457

Expenditure

Interest

32,96,966

Other administrative expenses

9,711

33,06,677

Net Loss

6,65,220

The AO computed the income as under:

Dividend income to be taxed separately under the head “Other Sources”

13,73,200

Loss under the head “income from business / profession”

20,38,420

The borrowed funds of Rs. 4,08,97,170/- was mostly utilised for the purchase of shares of shares and was blocked against shares held as stock-in-trade amounting to Rs. 3,16,90,626/-. Since borrowed funds were utilised in trading in shares, the AO held that the interest amounting to Rs. 32,96,966/- has to be adjusted against the business income (i.e., trading in shares) only. The AO thought to invoke explanation to section 73 on the ground that main source of income is trading in shares. He rejected the contention of the assessee that main source of income of the assessee is dividend income i.e., income from other sources because business income is Rs. 12,68,257; dividend income is Rs. 13,73,200, and thus dividend income is more, and hence explanation to section 73 cannot be invoked. Therefore, the loss in trading in shares cannot be treated as speculation loss, which mean that it is an ordinary business loss which can be set off against the normal income under the head “other sources”. In the assessment the Assessing Officer treated the loss of Rs. 20,38,420/- as speculation loss and taxed the dividend income of Rs. 13,73,200/- separately.

The Ruling:

· Explanation to section 73 would be applicable when the assessee is an investment company

· A case will not fall under the exception merely by the head under which income was finally assessed but by composition of gross total income as given in order.

· It is the abosolute figures of the loss or income either under the head ‘business’ or under the head ‘other sources’ without ‘sign’ which should be taken for comparison. The word “chargeable” used in explanation to section 73 would refer to chargeability to tax under the Act. This would only mean that loss may not be charged to tax directly in the current year. But by adjustment against other business income in that year or in following years, it reduces the other income on which tax is levied. Hence negative, income i.e. loss is as equally chargeable to tax as positive income. Hence, we have to consider absolute figure to determine as to whether an assessee company’s gross total income consists of mainly of income chargeable to tax under “business” head or under other four heads described in explanation to section 73.

· It is only the absolute figures which are to be taken into consideration for comparison to decide whether explanation can be applied or not. Therefore, in the present case, where loss due to trading in shares has greater figure than the figure of income from dividend, the explanation to section 73 is rightly invoked.

· If the whole of the business is that of sale and purchase of shares still, the provision of explanation would be applicable.

· If the assessee is dealing in the shares of one company only still the explanation can be invoked.

· Even if loss is on account of falling value of stock, it is still in the nature of loss incurred from that business.

· If the assessee’s income is mainly from dealing in shares and if the case does not fall in either of the two exceptions, explanation to section 73 will be invoked and loss arising from trading in shares will be treated as speculative. Section 28(2) is invoked when transaction/s is/are treated as speculative u/s 43(5). Whereas explanation to section 73 is invoked to decide whether loss from trading in shares can be deemed to be speculative. Section 28(2) comes into operation after holding the transaction as speculative i.e. it is posterior consideration whereas explanation to section 73 is for deciding speculative nature of loss i.e. it is an ‘interior’ consideration.

· No part of the interest expenditure is allowable to be allocated to dividend income because assessee is holding shares as stock-in-trade and therefore entire interest expenditure is allowable u/s 36(1)(iii).

· It is no longer necessary for the assessing officer to establish for invoking explanation to section, that assessee is manipulating to reduce its taxable income by trading in shares and incurring losses.

( Click here for full text of ruling AIT-2006-77-ITAT )