the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the second reassessment proceedings were not validly initiated and thereby quashing the reassessment proceedings-the proceedings initiated by the AO for the second time under Section 147 is barred by limitation-even the proviso to Section 147 does not come into play on the facts of the case-AIT-2010-373-HC   Even if the goods belong to same entry, manufacture does take place if new identifiable/marketable goods known in market emerge due to operation conducted-the process of ironing applied to the stiched brassieres prior to their packing was a process incidental to the completion of the brassieres as a manufactured product-process of purification and filtration being incidental or ancillary to the manufacture of a marketable product, the Respondent was entitled to Modvat credit on the inputs involved-AIT-2010-370-HC   Larger Bench of CESTAT rules the Tribunal has ample power to condone the delay in filing the appeal including the one filed under section 35 E (4)-AIT-2010-372-CESTAT Corruption in IRS takes its toll-Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Dhananjay Kumar arrested by CBI in Mumbai-Joint Commissioner of Customs & Excise Hemant Kothikar also arrested by CBI     FM directs expediting of Cadre Restructuring in CBDT & CBEC      Tariff Value for import of Brass Scrap is 3924-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 78    Chief Justice of Gauhati High Court Justice Ranjan Gogoi to be Chief Justice of Punjab & Haryana High Court    Anti-dumping duty on imports of Acrylic  Fibre originating in, or exported from Japan and Belarus-Customs Tariff Notification No.85  Prescribing SION for new product “Propylene” under Chemical & Allied Products Group-DGFT PN 7    Inclusion of Finished Leather in the Focus Product Scheme of FTP-DGFT PN 6    Exchange Rate for imported goods is Rs 47.25 per US Dollar and Rs 60.35  per EURO-Exchange Rate for export goods is Rs 46.30 per US Dollar and Rs 58.70 per EURO-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 77-Click on Exchange Rate for details   Anti Dumping Duty under the Notification No.15/2007 is not applicable to Spandex Yarn (Elastomeric yarn)-Customs Circular No.30    Import of goods under Notification No.13/2010 for Commonwealth Games, 2010-Customs Circular No.31    Larger Bench of CESTAT rules charges towards pre-delivery inspection and after-sale-service by dealers from buyers of the cars to be included in the assessable value of cars for payment of excise duty-AIT-2010-366-CESTAT    merely because there was non accounting of goods, penalty was technical and inference of clandestine removal was not called for-AIT-2010-365-HC  ITAT rules provision for doubtful debts and provision for standard debts are to be taken into consideration for computation of book profit u/s. 115JB of the IT Act-AIT-2010-361-ITAT    HC rules slitting of aluminum foils into customized width, mounting the same on the printing machine and thereafter printing the necessary text thereon is covered for 80IB benefit as it  falls within the ambit of the term “produce”-AIT-2010-363-HC    Definitive Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of Coumarin, originating in, or exported from China-Customs Tariff Notification No. 82   Special Bench of ITAT Ruling-where a forward contract is entered into by the assessee to sell the foreign currency at an agreed price at a future date falling beyond the last date of accounting period, the loss is incurred to the assessee on account of evaluation of the contract on the last date of the accounting period i.e. before the date of maturity of the forward contract-AIT-2010-355-ITAT-SB       
Services  |  Subscribe  |  Contact Us  |   Feedback   |  E-mail  |  News |  Home
JUDGMENTS
CENTRAL EXCISE
CUSTOMS
SERVICE TAX
INCOME TAX
VAT
FINANCE ACTS
FINANCE BILLS
EOU STPI
SEZ
DGFT
RBI
NTT
RESOURCES


    
Email | Print

Important Links         SC        HC        CESTAT        ITAT        AAR

ITAT RULINGS 2008/Page1

AIT-2008-01-ITAT
Voltas Ltd Vs ACWT, Mumbai-Special Bench

Whether value of immovable asset owned by assessee includible in the net wealth of the owner/assessee or the lessee in terms of section 4(8)(b) of the Wealth Tax Act read with section 269UA(f) the I-T Act where the term of the lease is (i) exceeding 12 months but less than 12 years; and/or (ii) exceeding 12 years

AIT-2008-02-ITAT
Shri Saurabh Srivastava Vs DCIT, New Delhi -Special Bench

Non-compete fees received by the assessee from F.I. Plc. UK being in the nature of a capital receipt not liable to tax

AIT-2008-03-ITAT
Ms. Mayawati Vs DCIT New Delhi

Addition can be sustained even u/s 69 of the I.T. Act because  source of investment in properties  stand fully explained in form of gifts found genuine

AIT-2008-04-ITAT
IBM Global Services India Private Ltd Vs DCIT, Bangalore

Payment made for using database is revenue and allowed.  expenditure included in valuation of transfer of human skills & representing  credit to transferred employees in respect of their services to Tata IBM, is not allowable

AIT-2008-10-ITAT
Rolls Royce Pl Vs. DDIT, New Delhi

Though contracts are signed outside India yet the negotiations and other discussions are in India and hence, all other profits can be said to accrue or arise into directly or indirectly through the operations of PE in India.  

AIT-2008-16-ITAT
Herbert Smith, Singapore firm Vs DCIT, New Delhi

AO processed the return u/s 143(1) and levied tax @ 35% applicable to ‘04’ status against the tax rate of 30% applied by the assessee

AIT-2008-21-ITAT
Amadeus Global Travel Distribution SA Vs DCIT, NDelhi

Business connection established in India -section 9(1)(i) the income in respect of the booking which takes place from the equipment in India can be deemed to accrue or arise in India and hence taxable in India

AIT-2008-24-ITAT
Sumit Bhattacharya Vs ACIT, Mumbai-Special Bench

Amount received on redemption of stock appreciation rights is in the nature of income

AIT-2008-45-ITAT
Ellora Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO, Mumbai

 whether income from warehousing is income from business or income from house property-claim of assessee was accepted in past- in view of the rule of consistency, claim of assessee has to be accepted for year under consideration

AIT-2008-51-ITAT
S Ramanathan Vs ITO, Gurgaon

 investment was in the joint names of herself, and her son- exemption from capital gains tax under Section 54EC of Income Tax Act admissible

AIT-2008-52-ITAT
Deepak Nitrite Limited Vs Deputy CIT, Baroda

 AO does not have the jurisdiction to go beyond the net profit as per Profit & Loss account except as provided in Explanation to Sec.115JA of Income Tax Act-AO has to levy the tax only on the book profit as per the Balance Sheet

AIT-2008-53-ITAT
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs ACIT, New Delhi

 determination of Arm's Length Price of international transaction with Associated Enterprises-AO, in the light of instruction of CBDT, was duty bound to refer the matter to the TPO

AIT-2008-54-ITAT
Van Oord ACZ India (P) Ltd Vs ACIT, New Delhi

 certificate u/s 195 (2) from ITO or for non-deduction of tax at source on payment to non-resident-payments made through Contractors to the non-residents in respect of mobilization and demobilization charges is covered within the provision of section 40 (a) (i) of the Act

AIT-2008-65-ITAT
TTK Healthcare Vs. ACIT, Chennai

 Sum received pursuant to a restrictive covenant amounts to non compete fee which was not taxable

AIT-2008-66-ITAT
M/s Amway India Enterprises Vs DCIT, New Delhi-Special Bench
 Expenditure on Software is Revenue Expenditure
AIT-2008-67-ITAT
Narang Overseas Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT, Mumbai-5 Member Special Bench
Mesne profit constitutes capital receipt not chargeable to tax
AIT-2008-74-ITAT
M/s Pranav Vikas (India) Ltd., Vs  ACIT, New Delhi

 right to receive interest of Rs. 2,40,000/- in question for the year under consideration was waived by the assessee company and as a result of the said waiver, there was no real income which could be brought to tax in its hands in that year on accrual basis

AIT-2008-89-ITAT
Bhagwad Swarup, Trust Vs  CIT, Dehradun-Special Bench

 where CIT does not pass order granting or refusing registration of Trust within the period laid down in sec.12AA(2) registration would be deemed granted

AIT-2008-97-ITAT
M/s. Goetze (India) Ltd Vs DCIT, New Delhi

 Reassessment made after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year cannot be justified 

AIT-2008-98-ITAT
I.T.C. Ltd. Vs JCIT, Kolkata
 Special Bench Ruling on 16 Issues
AIT-2008-99-ITAT
VSNL Vs CIT, Mumbai

Special Bench-telecommunication services through earth station set up by the assessee cannot be characterized either basic or cellular- assessee not entitled to deduction under section 80IA

AIT-2008-113-ITAT
Dhariwal Industries Ltd. Vs ACIT, Pune

Gutkha and pan masala containing tobacco are "tobacco preparation" and "chewing tobacco" within the meaning of Item no. 2 of the Eleventh Schedule to the I-T Act. Assessee manufacturing or producing Gutkha is not entitled to claim deduction u/s. 80I/80IA

AIT-2008-137-ITAT
Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Kolkata

Analysis undertaken to determine the arm's length price of the international transaction with Datacore USA is correct and on the basis of the analysis it is seen that transaction undertaken by the taxpayer with Datacore USA is at arm's length

AIT-2008-147-ITAT
HUF of H.H. Late Sir J.M. Scindia Vs. ACIT, Mumbai

Plot of land became the property of the Scindia family on the marriage of Jivajirao Scindia-auction sale of plot not given rise to capital gain exigible to tax  

AIT-2008-155-ITAT 
M/s. Central Travancore Specialists Hospital Ltd Vs. ACIT, Kottayam

It is not the case of the assessee that the deposit kept with the bank had any nexus with the setting up of the plant. In fact, it is a surplus fund which were kept with the bank on which the assessee earned interest. interest earned by the assessee even during the construction period on the short term deposit kept with the bank is assessable as an income

AIT-2008-174-ITAT 
Glenmark Laboratories Ltd Vs. DCIT, Mumbai

Deduction u/s 80HHC- To find out the direct cost relatable to trading export, one has to reduce that part of the direct cost attributable to earnings of DEPB from the value of total direct cost. any difference in realization of DEPB license will be treated u/s 28(iiid) of the Act

AIT-2008-175-ITAT
Vaishali A. Shelar Vs. ACIT, Thane

RBI's "Optional Early Retirement Scheme" (OERS) - assessees are entitled for relief u/s. 10(10C) of the I.T. Act in respect of the sums received under the OERS up to a sum of Rs. 5 lacs. assesses also entitled to relief u/s. 89 of the Act in respect of the sums, which are in excess of the exemption granted

ITAT Rulings    Page-2   Main Page


HOME ¦ Judgment ¦ Central Excise ¦ Customs  ¦ Service Tax ¦ Income Tax ¦ VAT ¦ Finance Act ¦ Finance Bills ¦ EOU STPI ¦ SEZ ¦ DGFT ¦ RBI ¦ NTT ¦ Resources

 

  Copyright © 2006 allindiantaxes.com | All rights reserved
website designing India & CMS development: Softlogics & Developments