AIT-2008-01-ITAT Voltas Ltd Vs ACWT, Mumbai-Special Bench | Whether value of immovable asset owned by assessee includible in the net wealth of the owner/assessee or the lessee in terms of section 4(8)(b) of the Wealth Tax Act read with section 269UA(f) the I-T Act where the term of the lease is (i) exceeding 12 months but less than 12 years; and/or (ii) exceeding 12 years |
AIT-2008-02-ITAT Shri Saurabh Srivastava Vs DCIT, New Delhi -Special Bench | Non-compete fees received by the assessee from F.I. Plc. UK being in the nature of a capital receipt not liable to tax |
AIT-2008-03-ITAT Ms. Mayawati Vs DCIT New Delhi | Addition can be sustained even u/s 69 of the I.T. Act because source of investment in properties stand fully explained in form of gifts found genuine |
AIT-2008-04-ITAT IBM Global Services India Private Ltd Vs DCIT, Bangalore | Payment made for using database is revenue and allowed. expenditure included in valuation of transfer of human skills & representing credit to transferred employees in respect of their services to Tata IBM, is not allowable |
AIT-2008-10-ITAT Rolls Royce Pl Vs. DDIT, New Delhi | Though contracts are signed outside India yet the negotiations and other discussions are in India and hence, all other profits can be said to accrue or arise into directly or indirectly through the operations of PE in India. |
AIT-2008-16-ITAT Herbert Smith, Singapore firm Vs DCIT, New Delhi | AO processed the return u/s 143(1) and levied tax @ 35% applicable to ‘04’ status against the tax rate of 30% applied by the assessee |
AIT-2008-21-ITAT Amadeus Global Travel Distribution SA Vs DCIT, NDelhi | Business connection established in India -section 9(1)(i) the income in respect of the booking which takes place from the equipment in India can be deemed to accrue or arise in India and hence taxable in India |
AIT-2008-24-ITAT Sumit Bhattacharya Vs ACIT, Mumbai-Special Bench | Amount received on redemption of stock appreciation rights is in the nature of income |
AIT-2008-45-ITAT Ellora Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO, Mumbai | whether income from warehousing is income from business or income from house property-claim of assessee was accepted in past- in view of the rule of consistency, claim of assessee has to be accepted for year under consideration |
AIT-2008-51-ITAT S Ramanathan Vs ITO, Gurgaon | investment was in the joint names of herself, and her son- exemption from capital gains tax under Section 54EC of Income Tax Act admissible |
AIT-2008-52-ITAT Deepak Nitrite Limited Vs Deputy CIT, Baroda | AO does not have the jurisdiction to go beyond the net profit as per Profit & Loss account except as provided in Explanation to Sec.115JA of Income Tax Act-AO has to levy the tax only on the book profit as per the Balance Sheet |
AIT-2008-53-ITAT Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs ACIT, New Delhi | determination of Arm's Length Price of international transaction with Associated Enterprises-AO, in the light of instruction of CBDT, was duty bound to refer the matter to the TPO |
AIT-2008-54-ITAT Van Oord ACZ India (P) Ltd Vs ACIT, New Delhi | certificate u/s 195 (2) from ITO or for non-deduction of tax at source on payment to non-resident-payments made through Contractors to the non-residents in respect of mobilization and demobilization charges is covered within the provision of section 40 (a) (i) of the Act |
AIT-2008-65-ITAT TTK Healthcare Vs. ACIT, Chennai | Sum received pursuant to a restrictive covenant amounts to non compete fee which was not taxable |
AIT-2008-66-ITAT M/s Amway India Enterprises Vs DCIT, New Delhi-Special Bench | Expenditure on Software is Revenue Expenditure |
AIT-2008-67-ITAT Narang Overseas Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT, Mumbai-5 Member Special Bench | Mesne profit constitutes capital receipt not chargeable to tax |
AIT-2008-74-ITAT M/s Pranav Vikas (India) Ltd., Vs ACIT, New Delhi | right to receive interest of Rs. 2,40,000/- in question for the year under consideration was waived by the assessee company and as a result of the said waiver, there was no real income which could be brought to tax in its hands in that year on accrual basis |
AIT-2008-89-ITAT Bhagwad Swarup, Trust Vs CIT, Dehradun-Special Bench | where CIT does not pass order granting or refusing registration of Trust within the period laid down in sec.12AA(2) registration would be deemed granted |
AIT-2008-97-ITAT M/s. Goetze (India) Ltd Vs DCIT, New Delhi | Reassessment made after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year cannot be justified |
AIT-2008-98-ITAT I.T.C. Ltd. Vs JCIT, Kolkata | Special Bench Ruling on 16 Issues |
AIT-2008-99-ITAT VSNL Vs CIT, Mumbai | Special Bench-telecommunication services through earth station set up by the assessee cannot be characterized either basic or cellular- assessee not entitled to deduction under section 80IA |
AIT-2008-113-ITAT Dhariwal Industries Ltd. Vs ACIT, Pune | Gutkha and pan masala containing tobacco are "tobacco preparation" and "chewing tobacco" within the meaning of Item no. 2 of the Eleventh Schedule to the I-T Act. Assessee manufacturing or producing Gutkha is not entitled to claim deduction u/s. 80I/80IA |
AIT-2008-137-ITAT Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Kolkata | Analysis undertaken to determine the arm's length price of the international transaction with Datacore USA is correct and on the basis of the analysis it is seen that transaction undertaken by the taxpayer with Datacore USA is at arm's length |
AIT-2008-147-ITAT HUF of H.H. Late Sir J.M. Scindia Vs. ACIT, Mumbai | Plot of land became the property of the Scindia family on the marriage of Jivajirao Scindia-auction sale of plot not given rise to capital gain exigible to tax |
AIT-2008-155-ITAT M/s. Central Travancore Specialists Hospital Ltd Vs. ACIT, Kottayam | It is not the case of the assessee that the deposit kept with the bank had any nexus with the setting up of the plant. In fact, it is a surplus fund which were kept with the bank on which the assessee earned interest. interest earned by the assessee even during the construction period on the short term deposit kept with the bank is assessable as an income |
AIT-2008-174-ITAT Glenmark Laboratories Ltd Vs. DCIT, Mumbai | Deduction u/s 80HHC- To find out the direct cost relatable to trading export, one has to reduce that part of the direct cost attributable to earnings of DEPB from the value of total direct cost. any difference in realization of DEPB license will be treated u/s 28(iiid) of the Act |
AIT-2008-175-ITAT Vaishali A. Shelar Vs. ACIT, Thane | RBI's "Optional Early Retirement Scheme" (OERS) - assessees are entitled for relief u/s. 10(10C) of the I.T. Act in respect of the sums received under the OERS up to a sum of Rs. 5 lacs. assesses also entitled to relief u/s. 89 of the Act in respect of the sums, which are in excess of the exemption granted |