Service Tax Circular No. 106/2008 - Filing of claim for refund of ST paid under noti 47/2007-ST

the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the second reassessment proceedings were not validly initiated and thereby quashing the reassessment proceedings-the proceedings initiated by the AO for the second time under Section 147 is barred by limitation-even the proviso to Section 147 does not come into play on the facts of the case-AIT-2010-373-HC Even if the goods belong to same entry, manufacture does take place if new identifiable/marketable goods known in market emerge due to operation conducted-the process of ironing applied to the stiched brassieres prior to their packing was a process incidental to the completion of the brassieres as a manufactured product-process of purification and filtration being incidental or ancillary to the manufacture of a marketable product, the Respondent was entitled to Modvat credit on the inputs involved-AIT-2010-370-HC Larger Bench of CESTAT rules the Tribunal has ample power to condone the delay in filing the appeal including the one filed under section 35 E (4)-AIT-2010-372-CESTAT Corruption in IRS takes its toll-Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Dhananjay Kumar arrested by CBI in Mumbai-Joint Commissioner of Customs & Excise Hemant Kothikar also arrested by CBI FM directs expediting of Cadre Restructuring in CBDT & CBEC Tariff Value for import of Brass Scrap is 3924-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 78 Chief Justice of Gauhati High Court Justice Ranjan Gogoi to be Chief Justice of Punjab & Haryana High Court Anti-dumping duty on imports of Acrylic Fibre originating in, or exported from Japan and Belarus-Customs Tariff Notification No.85 Prescribing SION for new product “Propylene” under Chemical & Allied Products Group-DGFT PN 7 Inclusion of Finished Leather in the Focus Product Scheme of FTP-DGFT PN 6 Exchange Rate for imported goods is Rs 47.25 per US Dollar and Rs 60.35 per EURO-Exchange Rate for export goods is Rs 46.30 per US Dollar and Rs 58.70 per EURO-Customs Non-Tariff Notification No. 77-Click on Exchange Rate for details Anti Dumping Duty under the Notification No.15/2007 is not applicable to Spandex Yarn (Elastomeric yarn)-Customs Circular No.30 Import of goods under Notification No.13/2010 for Commonwealth Games, 2010-Customs Circular No.31 Larger Bench of CESTAT rules charges towards pre-delivery inspection and after-sale-service by dealers from buyers of the cars to be included in the assessable value of cars for payment of excise duty-AIT-2010-366-CESTAT merely because there was non accounting of goods, penalty was technical and inference of clandestine removal was not called for-AIT-2010-365-HC ITAT rules provision for doubtful debts and provision for standard debts are to be taken into consideration for computation of book profit u/s. 115JB of the IT Act-AIT-2010-361-ITAT HC rules slitting of aluminum foils into customized width, mounting the same on the printing machine and thereafter printing the necessary text thereon is covered for 80IB benefit as it falls within the ambit of the term “produce”-AIT-2010-363-HC Definitive Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of Coumarin, originating in, or exported from China-Customs Tariff Notification No. 82 Special Bench of ITAT Ruling-where a forward contract is entered into by the assessee to sell the foreign currency at an agreed price at a future date falling beyond the last date of accounting period, the loss is incurred to the assessee on account of evaluation of the contract on the last date of the accounting period i.e. before the date of maturity of the forward contract-AIT-2010-355-ITAT-SB

JUDGMENTS

CENTRAL EXCISE

CUSTOMS

exchange rate

SERVICE TAX

INCOME TAX

VAT

FINANCE ACTS

FINANCE BILLS

EOU STPI

SEZ

DGFT

RBI

NTT

RESOURCES

Email | Print

Circular No. 106 /9 /2008-ST

F.No.137/84/2008-CX.4

Government of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

(Central Board of Excise & Customs)

New Delhi, dated the 11th December, 08

Sub:- Filing of claim for refund of service tax paid under notification No. 41/2007-ST dated 6/10/2007 – reg.

Notification No. 41/2007-ST, dated 6/10/2007 allows refund of service tax paid on specified services used for export of goods. The Board has from time to time examined the procedural difficulties arising in implementation of this refund scheme. In this context, a circular (No. 101/4/2008-ST, dated 12.5.2008) was issued earlier whereby the procedural difficulties that were being faced by the merchant exporters and the exporters having multi location offices were resolved. Subsequently, notification No. 32/2008-ST, dated 18.11.2008 has also been issued to (i) extend the period of filing of refund claim by the exporter from 60 days to six month and from the end of the quarter to which such refund claim pertains; and (ii) allow refund on testing service, without any copy of agreement with the buyer of goods, if such testing and analysis is statutorily stipulated by domestic rules and regulations.

2. The Board has received further references from field formations and trade seeking clarification on other procedural issues. Trade has also reported delays in sanction of refund claims. These issues and the clarification for streamlining of procedures are discussed below.

3. ISSUE No. I: The procedure for availing refund, under the aforesaid notification, by a manufacturer exporter not registered with central excise is as under:

(i)

He shall file the claim with the central excise authority having jurisdiction the over factory of manufacture [para 2 (b)(i) of the notification];

(ii)

He shall file a declaration in the format given in the annexure to the notification. The CX authority would issue a STC No. (Service Tax Code) to him [para 2 (c) and 2(d) of the notification].

The issue raised by some of the exclusive Central Excise Commissionerates is that they do not have access to the System for Allotment of Service Tax Payer Code (SAPS). Hence, exclusive Central Excise Commissionerates in places like Delhi and Bangalore have not been able to process the refund claims filed by the manufacturer exporter not registered with central excise.

CLARIFICATION: The Directorate of Systems has reported that there is no restriction for exclusive Central Excise Commissionerates in having access to SAPS. Therefore, exclusive Central Excise Commissionerates, not having access to SAPS at the moment, may approach the Directorate of Systems to get the access to the centralized software.

4. ISSUE NO. II: One of the conditions of the notification is that the exporter claiming exemption has actually paid the service tax on the specified services [para 1(c) of the notification]. The other condition is that the refund claim shall be accompanied by document evidencing payment of service tax [para 2(f) (ii) of the notification]. In this regard the following issues have been raised.

(i) Whether the invoices/bills/challan issued by the service provider, showing service tax amount could be treated as evidence that the exporter has paid the service tax.

(ii) The invoices produced by the exporters are at times not complete (i.e. does not have STC code of service provider)

(iii) One to one correlation between payment of ST and invoice is difficult in many cases.

CLARIFICATION: The invoices/challans/bills issued by supplier of taxable service, in conformity with rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, are reasonable evidence that the services on which refund is being sought are taxable service. The compliance of condition that exporter has actually paid the service tax rests with the exporter claiming refund. Therefore, in so far as this condition is concerned, the refund claim should be processed based on furnishing of appropriate invoices/ bills/ challan by the person claiming refund and undertaking to the effect of payment of service tax by him. For the purposes of compliance verification, random checks should be carried out independently and where the refund amount is significant, post refund audit may also be carried out.

As regards incomplete invoices/bills etc,., rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 prescribes the statutory requirement. Compliance of this rule requires that the invoices/challan/bills should be complete in all respect. Therefore, the exporter claiming refund of service tax under notification No. 41/2007-ST should ensure in their own interest that invoices/bills/challan should contain requisite details (name, address and registration No. of service provider, S. No. and date of invoice, name and address of service receiver, description, classification and value of taxable service and the service tax payable thereon). Refund claim cannot be allowed on the basis of invoices not having complete details as required verification cannot be carried out by the department on the basis of incomplete invoices.

5. ISSUE NO. III: Vide instruction F. No. 341/15/2007-TRU, dated 17.4.2008, direction has been issued that refund claim be disposed of within thirty days. Commissioners have stated that it is not practically feasible in all cases to dispose of the refund claim within this time frame in view of procedural and other issues involved in processing of claim.

CLARIFICATION: The difficulties arising in processing of claims may be brought to the notice of the Board. The procedural difficulties brought so far to the notice of the Board have been clarified earlier vide circular No. 101/4/2008-ST, dated 12.5.2008 and vide this circular. This should enable the field formations to dispose of the pending refund claims expeditiously. Therefore, every effort should be made by field formations to adhere to the prescribed timelines.

The Board has further decided that simplified procedure for refund, as prescribed by the Board vide circular No. 828/5/2006-CX dated 20.4.2006 for sanction of refund/rebate of unutilized CENVAT credit under rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004/rebate would mutatis mutandis apply to refund claims under notification No. 41/2007-ST. Under this simplified procedure, 80% of the due refund amount is sanctioned as adhoc interim refund to specified category of exporters having good track record, within 15 days of filing of a refund claim, subject to the condition that refund claim is complete and contains the requisite documents. For this purpose, the specified category of exporters would be (i) all exporters having export turnover of more than Rs 5 crore in the current or preceding financial year; (ii) PSUs including PSUs of State Governments; (iii) Star Export Houses as specified under Chapter 3.5 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2004-2009; (iv) manufacturer-exporters registered with Central Excise who have been exporting during the previous two financial years and have minimum export of Rs. 1 crore or more during the preceding financial year. (v) exporters registered with service tax or central excise who have paid central excise duty and/or service tax amounting to Rs. 1 crore or more during the preceding financial year; (vi) All Export Oriented Units.

6. Wide publicity may be given (in the form of trade notices, advertisements) to make the stakeholders aware of the above clarification and compliance should be monitored. Any difficulty faced in processing of refund claims under aforesaid notification may be immediately brought to the notice of the undersigned.

Yours faithfully,

(Gautam Bhattachraya)
Commissioner (ST)